Home
Twitter
RSS
Newsletter
Phil Larsen
21 Mar, 2007

PlayStation 3: Wait & See

PS3 Feature | The logical, conservative side of the story. How boring, right?
It’s been several months since the extremely underwhelming launch of the PS3 in North America and Japan. The day has finally come for us here in Australia, but the point is – it still really isn’t worth getting, and not by a long shot. You would have thought Sony would use the previous months to get their act together, but, despite having all the chances in the world, they haven’t gotten their own act together – rather, someone elses.

We can begin by discussing the entire point of a video games console – the games. The PlayStation 3 seems to have built up a hefty array of launch titles, but by saying they’ve gotten someone else’s act together, I mean it. These aren’t PS3 exclusive titles, and many have been available on the Xbox 360 for months now. Even if you were to buy them today, they would be much cheaper than the PS3 version. Let’s take a peek – the red games are those available for other consoles.
  • Untold Legends: Dark Kingdom
  • Formula One Championship Edition
  • Genji: Days of the Blade
  • MotorStorm
  • Resistance: Fall of Man
  • Ridge Racer 7
  • Full Auto 2: Battlelines
  • Mobile Suit Gundam: Crossfire
  • The Godfather: The Don's Edition
  • Call of Duty 3
  • Marvel: Ultimate Alliance
  • Tony Hawk’s Project 8
  • Def Jam: Icon
  • Fight Night Round 3
  • NBA Street: Homecourt
  • Need for Speed Carbon
  • Tiger Woods PGA Tour 07
  • Sonic the Hedgehog
  • Virtua Fighter 5
  • Virtua Tennis 3
  • World Snooker Championship 2007
  • NBA 2K7
  • NHL 2K7
  • Blazing Angels: Squadrons of WWII
  • Enchanted Arms
  • Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Vegas
  • Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell: Double Agent
  • The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion
  • F.E.A.R.
Let's now cut this list down even further. The Godfather is essentially a revamped port of the original game, with "Something" Edition tacked on to the title. It's the same with every console version, so don't worry about it. If we were to now check out the US ratings for the rest of the games, we're looking at average to outright bad scores for over half of the titles, leaving the best PS3 exclusive games as Ridge Racer 7, MotorStorm and Resistance: Fall of Man. Still. Yes, these titles were the only reasons to have purchased a PS3 in the preceding months overseas, and they're still the only reasons to get one now.

What, are we supposed to sit around playing Resistance until something else good comes out?

What, are we supposed to sit around playing Resistance until something else good comes out?
Close
So let's get one! Hmmm. Hold on a tic. The man behind the register is asking me for money! What kind of world do we live in where we need to pay money for stuff we want?

Yeah, this is a big problem for Sony. The astronomical $999 price point breaks the budget for many gamers, and bear in mind this is a console price - games, accessories, anything and everything will add hundreds to this price. It's not that the technology is bad, and Sony really are paying out big time to manufacture these units - but the average gamer (well, the cheap PS2 bundle deal kind of casual gamer, the kind who have propelled the PS2 into astronomical sales figures) just doesn't care enough about the potential of the machine to pay out such a hefty chunk of change.

And why should they care? This is untested ground for Sony, and it's clear that they are aiming for Microsoft's jugular with the online functionality and Blu-ray format. Xbox Live features an incredibly intuitive interface, and the numbers of supporters show just how well it works. The PS2 had online capabilities, but it paled in comparison to what Microsoft pulled together. Again, it boils down to the entire point of this article - wait and see, because expecting Sony to hit all the right notes with their untested online and multiformat approach is extremely risky.

And multiformat is truly the name of Sony's game. They won't be content until everyone actually lives inside a Sony console, where your entire life is controlled and displayed in High Definition. It's HDTV people - better resolution than the real world. Yeah, Sony has their Home service - which is again untested ground, despite being a rather neat idea. You can sit around Sony's Home, or you can actually sit in your real home - and it won't cost you $999. Plus subscription fees.

If you can bring people together, why not do it if they have a thousand bucks?

If you can bring people together, why not do it if they have a thousand bucks?
Close
Blu-ray, Blu-ray. Hmmmm. I saw on some video somewhere, some guy (rock-solid objective evidence here) was talking about how the PS3 will be a cheap Blu-ray player.

"There are two successors to the DVD player: the HD DVD player and the Blu-ray Disc player. Neither format is dominant over the other in terms of consumer adoption as of January 2007." -- some Wikipedia article

Man, I can't wait to watch a limited selection of Blu-ray movies I already own in DVD format. DVD was the only real option over the past few years, but now we have two avenues for our HD fix. Don't rush out and pick up Blu-ray this and that, because it's got some fighting to do. Let all the others with too much money on their hands fight these damn format wars, while afterwards you bask in the blood soaked battlefield of cheap standalone units. A Blu-ray player right now might set you back around $1100 (price is based on the sole unit available on eBay Australia. Yeah, that's how mainstream they are). So, if you look at it completely objectively, then yes the PS3 is an affordable player. But, single DVD players were also upwards of this price upon launch, and the PS2 was an extremely terrible DVD player. That's too much of a solidly poor history to assume everything is going to be A-OK this time around.

Capping off the discussion here is the attitude of Sony themselves. Forums around the world have been up in arms about their corporate behaviour - this includes backpedalling on comments, contradictions, accusations of "copying" Nintendo, lawsuits - the list goes on. The actual PAL launch delay was the fuel, and due to the vagueness of higher management comments, no one was actually sure whether or not it was intentional. It goes to show that they are a little nervous, and aren't starting business with as much of a lead as last time. Losing exclusives to Microsoft is a big problem, including the Virtua Fighter and Grand Theft Auto licenses. You'll be able to get your violence fix elsewhere, and Sony hasn't given much of an incentive for customers to pay almost twice the amount of money for the same gaming experiences.

It can do pretty much everything - we just don't know how well yet.

It can do pretty much everything - we just don't know how well yet.
Close
Sony may have the history of popularity behind them, but that's their strongest playing card this generation. There is no logical reason (beyond the possible demise of Blu-ray - which won't be dependent on the success of the PS3 itself) why Sony can't eventually provide excellent experiences with the PS3. It's the most powerful console out there, and has a strong third-party following - but the tumultuous leadup to this juggernaut launch has set off the anxiety alarm in many a gamer. It's really simple - save your money, wait, and see what's going to happen. I'm hoping it turns out extremely well, because personally, I'd rather enjoy what incredible experiences Sony has to offer than watch an amazing piece of technology steamroll itself into the ground.

Resistance and MotorStorm. Seriously, that's all there is right now. Pick up the pace, PS3!

--------------------------------------------------------------
Want the other side of the story? Head to PlayStation 3: Buy it Now.

Related Content

Christmas Buyers Guide - PlayStation 2
02 Dec, 2006 The titles every PS2 owner needs this Xmas.
PS3 launch line-up confirmed
20 Oct, 2006 Also, what's in the box and how much you pay for extras.
Sony exec admits PS3 price is 'high risk'
28 Jun, 2006 But we'll be paying for potential.
63 Comments
4 years ago
It's quite obvious why it isn't an option for everyone, most people don't have the "know how" to import, want a title now or are scared of hidden costs or it going missing.

Really, i bet less than 5% of people import/ed.
4 years ago
admeister wrote
Not to mention that Full Auto 2 is an exclusive title.
Last time I checked it was also on PSP.
4 years ago
Luke wrote
It's quite obvious why it isn't an option for everyone, most people don't have the "know how" to import, want a title now or are scared of hidden costs or it going missing.

Really, i bet less than 5% of people import/ed.
Fair enough, that's why I'm trying to spread the word. icon_smile.gif It's true that a lot of people that I've talked to had no idea about importing. You're probably right with the precentage there. Whenever I hear people talking about things that they find expensive here, I usually bring it up and answer any questions. I've done it numerous times with the PS3, as well as various games.

I'm raising awareness. icon_wink.gif

slapshakle: It's a Sony exclusive, quiet you. icon_wink.gif The main idea of the exlusive list is to show which games can't be purchased on X360 as well, I think you'll agree.
4 years ago
1) People should give the PS3 a chance, at least sometimes to develop.
After all, we gave the 360 a year for WOW and Wii for 5 months (or 2 years for Zelda:TP).

2) 360 is not cheaper or more value for money than the PS3.
Lets not forget online fees, wifi, browser, memory and many others.

3) You can't really compare the Wii ($400) with the PS3 ($1000).
They are in different classes. It is like DS (come out first, $200) vs. Wii ($400). It is obvious who wins initially.

Incomparable! It is a matter of personal preference, PS3 is mine. Period.
4 years ago
admeister wrote
slapshakle: It's a Sony exclusive, quiet you. icon_wink.gif The main idea of the exlusive list is to show which games can't be purchased on X360 as well, I think you'll agree.
Yeah, I know. I wasn't having a go at you. I thought you might not have known.
4 years ago
admeister wrote
I'm raising awareness. icon_wink.gif
I know this is supposed to be a joke but seriously, stop.

mqphu1 wrote
After all, we gave the 360 a year for WOW and Wii for 5 months (or 2 years for Zelda:TP).
Uh, what?
I don't understand what
you are saying.
Also, line
breaks are cool.
4 years ago
admeister, is the lack of warranty not something that concerns you? I'd import if I wanted a PS3, but like most people (I imagine), warranty (or lack thereof) is a major factor when you're forking out that sort of cash.
4 years ago
Nova Prime wrote
admeister, is the lack of warranty not something that concerns you? I'd import if I wanted a PS3, but like most people (I imagine), warranty (or lack thereof) is a major factor when you're forking out that sort of cash.
From what I've seen, Sony Australia will still cover it. It's not as if the U.S PS3s are any different internally.
4 years ago
mqphu1 wrote
1) People should give the PS3 a chance, at least sometimes to develop.
After all, we gave the 360 a year for WOW and Wii for 5 months (or 2 years for Zelda:TP).
This bends my brain a little, but I know what you mean and I agree with it - Give the PS3 a year to develop a few awesome titles before writing it off.

mqphu1 wrote
2) 360 is not cheaper or more value for money than the PS3.
Lets not forget online fees, wifi, browser, memory and many others.
Yeah, let's not forget all those entirely optional extra features that the console offers, and at least one fictional one (browser, wtf?)! They truly are the scourge of consumer choice!
4 years ago
admeister wrote
Nova Prime wrote
admeister, is the lack of warranty not something that concerns you? I'd import if I wanted a PS3, but like most people (I imagine), warranty (or lack thereof) is a major factor when you're forking out that sort of cash.
From what I've seen, Sony Australia will still cover it. It's not as if the U.S PS3s are any different internally.
I'm pretty sure they aren't, aren't they - hence the whole emulation issue. But anyway that still doesn't mean Sony Aus would fix it up, after all you made them lose some potential money by importing. I would be wary.

EDIT: Had 'are' rather than 'aren't' as a typo. My bad.
4 years ago
Nova Prime wrote
It's not that I think it won't deliver exactly, more that you can get a very similar experience for around half the price, unless you're after very specific games.
As similiar as they maybe, they are not identical, so its going to come down to how much an individual is willing to sacrifice their hobby for a few hundred dollars.

Quote
And secondly, with the Wii still more or less sold out in the US (as far as I understand) as it has been since launch, and a very strong seller everywhere else, I'd hardly call its future foggy.
I described in an earlier post by what I define as 'foggy' so I won't repeat it here.

@Dances: English isn't mqphu1's first language, so he's not doing too bad.
4 years ago
Karai Pantsu wrote
mqphu1 wrote
2) 360 is not cheaper or more value for money than the PS3.
Lets not forget online fees, wifi, browser, memory and many others.
Yeah, let's not forget all those entirely optional extra features that the console offers, and at least one fictional one (browser, wtf?)! They truly are the scourge of consumer choice!
I think what he's saying is that the 360 has online fees (when the PS3 doesn't) and the PS3 has a browser (which the Xbox 360 doesn't). It's horrendously phrased, but that's what he means (I think).
4 years ago
crestfallen wrote
@Dances: English isn't mqphu1's first language, so he's not doing too bad.
Really? Damn I feel like an ass then. icon_confused.gif
4 years ago
DancesInUnderwear wrote
admeister wrote
Nova Prime wrote
admeister, is the lack of warranty not something that concerns you? I'd import if I wanted a PS3, but like most people (I imagine), warranty (or lack thereof) is a major factor when you're forking out that sort of cash.
From what I've seen, Sony Australia will still cover it. It's not as if the U.S PS3s are any different internally.
I'm pretty sure they are, aren't they - hence the whole emulation issue. But anyway that still doesn't mean Sony Aus would fix it up, after all you made them lose some potential money by importing. I would be wary.
Fair enough, and I'll admit you're right, there is one difference which is the emulation. Other than that, they're the same. Warranty is always an issue when it comes to importing, a hurdle you have to try and overcome. I'll see how it goes in future, I'm crossing my fingers that I never need to use the warranty.
Add Comment
Like this feature?
Share it with this tiny url: http://palg.nu/tn

N4G : News for Gamers         Twitter This!

Digg!     Stumble This!

| More
Currently Popular on PALGN
My most memorable PALGN reviews
Gamers love nostaligia and lists.
Nintendo Store Update - 10/02/12
And that's the end of that chapter!
Final Fantasy XIII-2 Review
Oh good, it's not an excuse to play dress ups.
Soul Calibur V Review
The burning soul will never extinguish!
Australian Gaming Bargains - 08/12/11
'Tis the season to be bargaining.