Home
Twitter
RSS
Newsletter
Jeremy Jastrzab
04 Nov, 2008

Gears of War 2 Review

360 Review | Team Delta returns, bigger and better than before.
For a long time after its original release in November 2006, Gears of War was the technical front runner on the Xbox 360 and the shining beacon for technical prowess in the HD generation. To date, it was one of the best exponents of the overused Unreal III engine. It also provided an intense and visceral gaming experience that had players hanging on to the edge of their seats. Two years later and fresh off the surprisingly competent Unreal Tournament III port, Epic are back with the follow-up to one of best sellers on the Xbox 360, in Gears of War 2.

Off the bat, Gears of War 2 has number of improvements over its predecessor. In particular, the story is much stronger and delivered in a much more meaningful manner, though knowledge of the original is recommended. The story will never be deep enough to compare with a game such as GTA IV or Metal Gear Solid 4, as there is still a lot of meat-head military banter flying around. However, the constant doubt seeded in the player’s mind over which faction, the humans or the Locust, is actually winning or doing the ‘right’ thing, as well as the deeper character development and one heck of a wild ride is what makes for a more exciting and fulfilling narrative, even if a few things are left unexplained or don’t make sense.

The addition of colour is nothing to smirk at.

The addition of colour is nothing to smirk at.
Close
Overall, Gears of War 2 is a better game, though essentially the same one as its predecessor. There have been some minor improvements, though given the success of the original, the development team obviously went with the old mantra ‘if it’s not broken, don’t fix it’. Thankfully, a few of the things that were broken have been fixed, to an extent. While Gears of War 2 provides the same type of visceral and intense action of its predecessor, it does so with an increased level of variety and a stronger design. Still, not everything is quite where you’d expect it to be, especially for such a blockbuster title.

The crux of Gears of War had players moving taking control of either the main protagonist, Marcus Fenix or his squad mate Dom Santiago, through numerous situations involving the use of cover and stop-and-pop gunplay. Gears of War 2 follows a similar structure, though there is an added variety to the situations that you’ll encounter. While said variety is stronger in the first half of the game, there are numerous memorable and exciting set pieces that the player really has to experience for themselves to make the most of them.

It’s not all stop-and-pop, as there are a few curly situations through out the game. These include a sequence where you’re required to manufacture your own cover from 'razor hail', carry an explosive box with a partner and protect your partner from automated security systems. The most interesting one was where you had cover that you have to ‘move’ in order to protect your partner and that was certainly the high point of variety. Furthermore, there are a few more boss fights and they’re much more exciting and breathtaking this time around. There are a couple of vehicle sequences, though the main one is very frustrating due to very slippery controls and a couple of trial-and-error parts. There other two, well, you’re best off seeing them for yourselves. A few other minor additions to the games arsenal include a poison grenade, boom shield, flamethrower, Gatling gun and Mortar cannon.

Yeah, that's going to work.

Yeah, that's going to work.
Close
The major improvements come from the friendly AI and difficulty curve. Believe it or not, you now actually have AI partners that are useful. They’ll take cover as required and actually help you pick off enemies. Even though they are still prone to gaffs (such as a reluctance to rush to revive you), this improvment is the most welcome. Sometimes when you’re lost, they’ll line up at the place where you’re meant to go next, which is quite handy. It certainly makes for a less frustrating game, though not necessarily an easier one. The difficulty curve is much smoother this time around. The set pieces aren’t so erratically difficult, so you’re only likely to be repeating the one sequence a lot at the back end of the game.

If your main beef with Gears of War was the control scheme, then you’re not going to like it any better this time around. Apart from the addition of a few finishing animations, the controls in the sequel are the same as before. However, the level design is much stronger now, so their limitations are not as exposed as they were before. This holds true for most of the game, as there were far fewer moments where we were left for dead. However, there were times were the A button assigned to everything would do something that we didn’t want it to, such as jump when we actually wanted to run.

The single player experience in Gears of War 2 is an unrelenting 10 to 12 hour ride that only lets up once the final credit has rolled past and is a more enjoyable experience than the original. However, the whole freshness and aspect of ‘new’ that came with the first game won’t really come across here unless you haven’t played the original. Unfortunately, for a game as high profile as this one, there seems to have been something missed in QA. Through out our play through, we had to restart at the last checkpoint no less than three times through the one play through because of glitches. Once was because our vehicle got stuck and once because Dom decide run off a platform and the game leaving us stuck. As complicated and ambitious as the title is, and while not necessarily game breaking, such occurrences are unacceptable in this day and age.

My what a big gun you have.

My what a big gun you have.
Close
While the single-player experience has improved thanks to a better AI and design. However, the game is still best played with a partner in co-op. Still catering for the two players, you’ve got similar options such as split paths and the ability to revive one another if need be. However, there aren’t a lot of split paths this time around and there isn’t too much done with them outside of the first and second chapters, which is somewhat disappointing. Basically, they seem like they’ve been put there for the sake of it later in the game.

Gears of War multiplayer sessions were some of the most frequented on Xbox Live and without a doubt, Gears of War 2 will be no different. There are now eight different game modes, including those that are new and improved, as well as the ability to have up to ten players in a match, over the previous eight. Furthermore, bots can now be employed to fill in any missing spots. Micro additions to the gameplay include the ability to pick up down players and use them as shields, as well as the ability to crawl while incapacitated, in the hope that a nearby team mate will revive you.

In addition to modes such as ‘Guardian’, where you can only respawn if the designated guardian is still alive and ‘Submission’, where the ‘flag’ is a stranded NPC with a gun, you have a co-op mode called ‘Horde’. Here, up to five players fight off wave after wave of invading Locust. This goes on for 50 waves, though you can save after every five. Overall, the additions and refinements to the multiplayer are sure to be a hit. However, there are reports of issues such as host advantage and lag. With regards to the latter, it is unknown whether this is related to the lack of players at the moment, or whether it will get worse once everyone else hits. Either way, anything less than a stellar performance is disappointing, particularly given Epic’s track record with online multiplayer.

Here comes the Horde.

Here comes the Horde.
Close
As mentioned in our hands-on preview last month, the addition of colour and vibrance makes for much more visually appealing experience. Gears of War was and still is one of the best looking HD titles available and Gears of War 2 now has the one-up on it. We could write another entire review on the visuals alone, though we’ll just say that when a developer can fit this much eye-candy onto the one DVD, those crying about disc space need to utilise their programming skills better. Disappointingly, there are a few weird glitches that pop-in and take away a little from what is otherwise brilliant looking game. The audio is very intense, loud and will definitely give you surround sound a good work out. The sound track for the game is actually quite exciting and suits the game very well, though aspects such as the voicing and the like are fairly typical. The actual use of the sound could have been a bit better, as sometimes it can be hard to tell where a noise is coming from.

Even though Gears of War 2 is very close follow-up to the original blockbuster, it has made a number of the necessary additions and improvements that make it a better experience overall. The campaign is a wild ride with some amazing sites and sounds, while the multiplayer experience promises to be everything that the original provided and more. While not as ‘new’ as the original, and with what seems to be a disappointing lack of polish, what with the minor glitches that have crept in, there aren’t many other experiences that will come out over this holiday period that will provide the same intensive ride that could only be pulled off by a skilled developer such as Epic. Unless you really didn’t like the scheme from the last game, Gears of War 2 is one of the most viscerally enjoyable experiences you're likely to have this holiday season.
The Score
Gears of War 2 is one of the most intense and viscerally enjoyable and sensually appealing gaming experiences that you'll likely have this holiday season.
Looking to buy this game right now? PALGN recommends www.Play-Asia.com.

Related Gears of War 2 Content

Gears of War 2 DLC going cheap
13 Oct, 2010 Another massive bargain for Xbox Live.
Xbox Avatars getting Gears of War armour
26 Jul, 2009 Finally a chance to look like Marcus Fenix.
Gears of War 2: Dark Corners DLC screens
22 Jul, 2009 Not as dark as you might think.
83 Comments
3 years ago
Masterpiece my ass.
3 years ago
Awesome review, for what sounds like an awesome game.

Can someone please post if someone breaks street date? I cant wait! icon_biggrin.gif
3 years ago
Haha, seems the review has caused quite the sh*tstorm in the N4G community (comments section): http://www.n4g.com/xbox360/News-226255.aspx

I'll probably pick the game up for a bit of MP, might draw me away from CoD4 for a bit (though Halo 3 was the last game I said that about and it lasted a whole of 5 minutes).
3 years ago
For God's sake, what's wrong with some gamers these days? You're seriously having a cry over a review score? An 8.5 for that matter? That's a damn good score. And anyway, I know this has been said millions of times before, but seriously, does a number really affect how much you enjoy a game?

And the funny thing is, if PALGN had scored this a 10, people would still be complaining, and saying they've sold out etc.

Don't get me wrong, disagree with the review/score all you like, but it's pathetic that some people go as far as question the credibility of this site (best damn gaming site on the net in my opinion) and think an 8.5 (a freaking 8.5!) is a bad score. Why do people take a number at the end of a review as scripture? That's a depressing sign for the future of the gaming.

If I'm interested in a game, I do not consult the bible (Metacritic) and ask for its' blessing. I've often had far more enjoyment with games that average between 50-80 than I have with games averaging over 90.

Apologies for the rant, but some people take gaming a little too seriously. It's not mathematics, it's a hobby.[/i]
3 years ago
berva inc wrote
8.5 out of 10? you have just lost all credibility. You score Resistance Fall Of man a 8.5/10 and also Gears 2 a 8.5/10 I mean really?

gears 2 = 9.6/10
Resistance 1 = 7.8/10

Are you just trying to stand out on Metacritic? That could be the only reason you would score this masterpiece so low.
Masterpiece? This is Gears of War we are talking about right?
3 years ago
berva inc wrote
8.5 out of 10? you have just lost all credibility. You score Resistance Fall Of man a 8.5/10 and also Gears 2 a 8.5/10 I mean really?

gears 2 = 9.6/10
Resistance 1 = 7.8/10

Are you just trying to stand out on Metacritic? That could be the only reason you would score this masterpiece so low.
Signing up just to criticize someone else means your opinion has no credibility.
3 years ago
BurnZ wrote
berva inc wrote
8.5 out of 10? you have just lost all credibility. You score Resistance Fall Of man a 8.5/10 and also Gears 2 a 8.5/10 I mean really?

gears 2 = 9.6/10
Resistance 1 = 7.8/10

Are you just trying to stand out on Metacritic? That could be the only reason you would score this masterpiece so low.
Signing up just to criticize someone else means your opinion has no credibility.
Logging on and posting on a forum just to criticize someone for signing up just to criticize someone else means your opinion has no credibility.

Well aware of the hypocrisy. Or is it irony? I can never tell.
3 years ago
It would be if what you said wasn't utter tripe. Thumbs up for defending a troll with too much time, which makes you a troll with too much time that shares his view.
3 years ago
hhwhatthehello, are you just bitter because you got demoted to the "special class" at a school for the mentally challenged?
3 years ago
Sinthesys wrote
It would be if what you said wasn't utter tripe. Thumbs up for defending a troll with too much time, which makes you a troll with too much time that shares his view.
No, thumbs up to you for taking my post seriously.

The Brett wrote
hhwhatthehello, are you just bitter because you got demoted to the "special class" at a school for the mentally challenged?
I take offense to that. You should watch what you say and who you say it to you dick.
3 years ago
Heh, and thumbs up for taking The Brett's post seriously.

'Dear diary, today somebody insulted me on the internet...'
3 years ago
Sinthesys wrote
Heh, and thumbs up for taking The Brett's post seriously.

'Dear diary, today somebody insulted me on the internet...'
Yes, because sarcasm is so blatantly obvious in a direct insult. You know nothing about my life, and what comments can offend people, so don't patronize me.
3 years ago
Well, this thread is certainly getting interesting, on the plus side, at least no one is complaining about the 8.5 anymore. Now it's just degenerating into mindless name calling, yay for anonymity!
3 years ago
I think 8.5 is an allrght score but it seems that this sight is a little harsh on everything, I mean they gave Bioshick a 9.0 when it first came out whch was one of it's lowest scores. It's just the way PALGN scores games even so one not so perfect review should affect your opinion on the game, I for on am still going to get this the moment it comes out and play it all day and night. But what's with everyone comparing it to GTA IV, I mean I like GTA IV but think if any game got a bandwagon hype it is for sure GTA IV.
3 years ago
PalGN works on a "5 is average" scale, whereas most sites work on a 6 or even 7 is "average" scale, that's why a lot of games tend to lose a mark or a half mark here and there, but if you read the reviews you will see exactly why a particular game lost those points, like, for instance, GeOW2 apparantly has a few niggling bugs that mar the final product and although it builds upon what the first game offered and betters it, it isn't quite enough to really meet the quality of recent titles.

Makes perfect sense to me.

I wasn't that huge a fan of the first game, it was ok, but nothing spectacular, so I think I'll wait a bit before getting this one.
3 years ago
the only qualm i have about the score is how he talked it up as if he was giving it an 8.9 at least then pulls the rug for small little things. i'm not saying that an 8.5 is bad, but the way i read the review and understood it the score didn't match. oh and the comment about GTA IV having a better story line hahahaha are you f***ing kidding me! that script was probably written in a day by a guy who watched far too many gangster movies, and MGS storyline is so confusing that no one know what the hell is going on anyways, yeah i think that's the best kind of writing... NOT! Gears 1 was one of the better written games in a long time and if number 2 has that much better of a storyline then seriously this review made me think twice about reading reviews from this site again
3 years ago
Ha ha, no matter how great a game is you can always count on some attention seeking site to score it much lower than the majority of sites do. Happens all the time. It's a great strategy for getting traffic though. I never would have came here had this cry for attention not been sticking out like a sore thumb at gamerankings (It even caused me to register.). So an 8.5 is one of the best games this holiday season? Well, I guess this is a pretty poor year for games. icon_smile.gif
3 years ago
3 years ago
Wickerman1972 wrote
Ha ha, no matter how great a game is you can always count on some attention seeking site to score it much lower than the majority of sites do. Happens all the time. It's a great strategy for getting traffic though. I never would have came here had this cry for attention not been sticking out like a sore thumb at gamerankings (It even caused me to register.). So an 8.5 is one of the best games this holiday season? Well, I guess this is a pretty poor year for games. icon_smile.gif
I feel sorry you mate. I really do. You believe everything you read from GameTrailers , IGN and the likes.

Think for yourself. Have you ever wondered why those so called "exclusive reviews" of big games from IGN for example are usually high?

Its because publishers advertise their game on the site, or offer the opportunity to these game sites to review their games first but under pre conditions. That's why you usually see ads for big games being plastered in the home page of Gamespot IGN and other big sites.

If you believe everything reviewers tell you, then GTA4 is the greatest game ever made according to reviewers.

So please wise up, start thinking for yourself mate and stop believing everything you read from IGN and the likes.
3 years ago
I cant believe the people in here complaining about the score. It is a good score it was rated on its on merits geez would you rest easier at night if it was a 9 or 10? at the end of the day it is just a number and as long as your enjoying it thats all that matters isnt it??

In any case i will be picking it up I loved the original game and cannot wait to see what happens with the sequel.
3 years ago
This is one of the most amazing threads I have seen at PALGN, seriously, what a bunch of whingers, a review is a totally subjective thing no need to get all "man you's guys really suck, attention seeking losers this game is easy 11/10"

heaven forbid i thought the first gears was only about a 7/10, i guess that makes me an attention seeker also...if you think the game is so ****** good buy it, like this review was ever going to stop you anyway....If you don't like the way the site review's games **** off then and don't come back...easy as that.

Good review...
3 years ago
Smurf80 wrote
I cant believe the people in here complaining about the score. It is a good score it was rated on its on merits geez would you rest easier at night if it was a 9 or 10? at the end of the day it is just a number and as long as your enjoying it thats all that matters isnt it??

In any case i will be picking it up I loved the original game and cannot wait to see what happens with the sequel.
Those complaining about the score are a narrow minded kooks who live and die by game reviews. Really pathetic. If people react to a game review like those complaining about the score, its about time you got lives.

There are more important things than a game review. Its really sad attacking a review/reviewer just because its not what we expected.

And the irony of it all is all those criticising the review haven't even played the game yet!.
3 years ago
Wow, this thread degenerated fast.

From what I've read, it's better than its predecessor in very way, and in the case of some sequels, that's all you really want. I'll definately pick it up for sure (note I made this judgment based on reading a review, not reading a number at the end of one).

And yes, it is amusing to see the people in this thread who think they have a better sense of judgment than the reviewer despite having the handicap of not playing the game.

LeonJ wrote
@ The Brett: That's an unfair comment to eurogamer. Their reviews are the best in the business (IMO) and if a game gets a *10* it deserves it.
Fable 2 has far too many flaws to be considered one of the best games this generation.
3 years ago
I agree how can you criticise a game that you havent even played. A 8.5 is still a pretty good score even though it's a little lower than most of the other review sites, but still a less than a perfect score should not affect your purchase. If you like the first game than you will probaly like the second ,as for me I'm going to get it no matter the score is.
3 years ago
Reply to The Genius:

Conspiracy theories, lol. Yep, you must be right and I must be wrong. Instead of things being the way I said this is obviously a big conspiracy with all of the other gaming sites on the internet accepting bribe money for favorable reviews. Standing alone is PALGN, the only honest gaming site in existence. Everyone else's review scores might be for sale but not theirs. They are the embodiment of honesty in a dishonest world.

The next thing you'll probably tell me is that an American intelligence agency has installed a computer chip in your brain.:)

And speaking of advertising I already alluded to that. PALGN is doing their advertising on Gamerankings and Metacritic. This cry for attention, this plea of, "Look at me. I'm different!" makes it obvious. And it is working for them. Surely this aberration has caused enough curiosity so that lots of people have visited the site. Mission accomplished.

I guess that might be a conspiracy theory in its own right. But at least mine isn't as sweeping. Mine involves just one site being dishonest while yours requires every gaming site on the net to be on the take except for PALGN.

They call it one of the best games this holiday season and then give it an 8.5. You don't see the inconsistency in that? For there to be no inconsistency there would have to be no great games available this holiday season, but merely pretty good ones. I suppose the score was to generate traffic while the text was to ensure people that they weren't insane despite the score.
Add Comment
Like this review?
Share it with this tiny url: http://palg.nu/sj

N4G : News for Gamers         Twitter This!

Digg!     Stumble This!

| More
  Pre-order or buy:
    PALGN recommends: www.Play-Asia.com

Australian Release Date:
  7/11/2008 (Confirmed)
Standard Retail Price:
  $99.95 AU
Publisher:
  Microsoft
Genre:
  Shooter
Year Made:
  2008

Read more...
Currently Popular on PALGN
My most memorable PALGN reviews
Gamers love nostaligia and lists.
Nintendo Store Update - 10/02/12
And that's the end of that chapter!
Final Fantasy XIII-2 Review
Oh good, it's not an excuse to play dress ups.
Soul Calibur V Review
The burning soul will never extinguish!
Australian Gaming Bargains - 08/12/11
'Tis the season to be bargaining.